AOSplaneCompareDevin

Devin vs AOSplane

Your team should not be the first reviewer of an agent’s pull request. AOSplane scopes the change, reviews it, and QA-tests it before anyone on the team is asked to look. The pull request arrives with the spec, the review notes, QA’s results, and what that task spent. Devin is Cognition’s own agent, and opening a pull request from a ticket is not the difference: Devin’s Pro plan already includes Linear. The difference is who reviews first, and whether spend is a hard cap on the task or a shared credit pool. Prices below are from Devin’s self-serve billing docs as read on 11 November 2026.

  • Hard spend cap per task
  • Linear and Jira
  • Claude Code and Codex

7 sections · 4 min read

On this page7 sections
  1. 01The short version
  2. 02Who the agent is
  3. 03What the plans cost
  4. 04What happens before code lands
  5. 05Side by side
  6. 06When Devin is the better fit
  7. 07When AOSplane is the better fit

The short version

Pick Devin when you want Cognition’s agent and a quota you share across the team. Pick AOSplane when the pull request your team opens should already have been scoped, reviewed, and QA-tested, and when a task that would cross its cap should not start.

Both can start from Linear. Devin’s Pro plan lists Slack, Linear, and MCP. AOSplane starts a session from a Linear issue or from the AOSplane agent inside Linear, and also from a Jira Cloud issue, the console, or a project API key. Slack on AOSplane is rolling out.

Who the agent is

Devin is the agent. Pro’s daily and weekly quota covers Devin sessions, the Devin CLI, and Devin Desktop. Max raises that to a larger weekly allowance with no daily cap. There is no separate “bring Claude Code” mode in the plan description.

AOSplane is the loop around agents you choose. Claude Code runs on your Anthropic account and reads CLAUDE.md. Codex runs on your OpenAI account and reads AGENTS.md. Kiro, Cursor, and Tower run in preview. The provider bills the account you connect. AOSplane bills platform usage separately, by the second, with a monthly credit on the plan.

What the plans cost

Devin’s self-serve docs list four plans. Pro and Max are single-member. A shared subscription is Teams.

Devin planPrice in the docsWho it covers
FreeFree, limited usage. Includes Devin Review and DeepWiki.1 member
Pro$20 a month. Daily and weekly quota, then on-demand credits.1 member
Max$200 a month. Larger weekly quota, no daily cap.1 member
Teams$80 a month minimum. Full seats are $40. Flex seats are free and draw on shared credits.Up to 100 members

On-demand credits are prepaid, roll over, and do not expire. Teams shares one pool, with no per-member balance. Admins can set a default session spending limit and auto-reload from Settings, Usage and limits. Teams can also assign members to up to three usage tiers. New work stops once a member hits their tier. The same page says organization budgets of the kind described for Enterprise are an Enterprise control, not part of those three tiers.

If you have an eligible ChatGPT subscription, Devin’s docs say GPT usage can bill that plan instead of the Devin allowance. That is Devin’s option for GPT models, not a way to run Claude Code on an Anthropic key.

AOSplane’s Free plan is self-serve: 2 projects, 2 tasks at a time per project, small machines, 7 days of history, and a $5 monthly usage credit. Starter is $39 and Team is $149. Paid plans start with a call. The model invoice is still yours. Plan details.

What happens before code lands

On AOSplane, Plan first asks the product manager for a spec with a check on each acceptance criterion. You approve it, or you request changes, before the session’s agent writes code. Review reads the change. QA runs the repository’s checks and, for that mode, one command per criterion. Exit code 0 passes. A draft pull request opens once they pass. Agents cannot push to your repositories. You merge, in AOSplane or on GitHub.

Devin’s docs describe sessions that do the work, and Devin Review as a separate review of a pull request. A public GitHub pull request can be reviewed at devinreview.com without a Devin account and without on-demand credits. Private reviews and automations on Teams draw on the shared credit pool. This page does not claim Devin merges for you, and it does not claim Devin refuses to. The AOSplane rule is the one this site states: a person merges.

The spend check is also earlier. Organization, project, and agent budgets are read together before an AOSplane run starts. The tightest limit wins. If the reservation would exceed what is left, that task does not start. Runs already going are not cancelled by the check. Devin’s Teams tiers block new work at the member’s limit, and a session spending limit can cap a session. Those are real controls. They meter Devin usage, not an Anthropic or OpenAI invoice you hold.

Side by side

Devin, from its docsAOSplane
AgentDevin, including Desktop and CLI on the same quota.Claude Code or Codex, on your account. Others in preview.
SpendQuota, then Cognition on-demand credits. Eligible ChatGPT plans can cover GPT usage.The task’s own cap. Over it, that task does not start. The cost is on the record with the pull request.
Before a task spendsPlan allowance, then credits. Teams tiers can block a member. Session spend limits are configurable.Organization, project, and agent budgets. Over the tightest, the new task does not start.
Where it startsPro includes Slack, Linear, and MCP.Linear, Jira Cloud, the console, or the API.
What you mergeNot stated as a merge policy on the billing page.A draft pull request. Agents cannot push. A person merges.

When Devin is the better fit

  • You want Devin Desktop and the Devin CLI, not Claude Code or Codex.
  • A daily and weekly quota, plus prepaid credits, matches how you buy agent usage.
  • You want Devin Review on pull requests, including the free pass it offers on public GitHub pull requests.

When AOSplane is the better fit

  • The first reviewer of the pull request should be AOSplane’s review and QA, not someone on the team.
  • You want Claude Code or Codex, and the same treatment whether the ticket is in Linear or Jira.
  • Spend should be a hard cap on that task, not a draw on a shared credit pool. How the cap sits next to Claude Code’s own limits.
  • Review and QA are separate steps. What each one proves.

Devin plan names, prices, seat rules, and credit behavior are from docs.devin.ai self-serve plans as read on 11 November 2026, and may have changed. Enterprise ACU billing is a different Devin contract and is not restated here. Devin is not an AOSplane product. AOSplane details are what this site says the product does today.

Keep reading

Keep reading.
Guides and comparisons.

Get started

Give your agents
their first task.

Connect your AI account, pick a repository and hand off a task. The free plan is ready in minutes.

Read the quickstart